BRTFS
Re: BRTFS
You've nothing to lose with trying it, as it has in-place conversion and roll-back to/from ext3/4 and it might be the default for F17 if we're lucky.
Oh, and isn't it BTRFS, instead of BRTFS?
Oh, and isn't it BTRFS, instead of BRTFS?
SgtFoo
HDA: VM inside oVirt FX-8300 95w (2 cores for HDA), 32GB RAM (2GB for HDA)
My PC: FX-8300, 16GB RAM, 3x 1TB HDDs, Radeon HD6970 2GB video; Win10 Pro x64
Other: PC, Asus 1215n (LXLE), Debian openZFS server (3x(2x2tb) mirrors)
Modem&Network: Thomson DCM475; Asus RT-AC66U; HP 1800-24G switch
HDA: VM inside oVirt FX-8300 95w (2 cores for HDA), 32GB RAM (2GB for HDA)
My PC: FX-8300, 16GB RAM, 3x 1TB HDDs, Radeon HD6970 2GB video; Win10 Pro x64
Other: PC, Asus 1215n (LXLE), Debian openZFS server (3x(2x2tb) mirrors)
Modem&Network: Thomson DCM475; Asus RT-AC66U; HP 1800-24G switch
Re: BRTFS
Very likely we will not be incorporating Amahi with Fedora 16. Since Fedora 17 is due out next week, that would be the target of choice. Not sure of the file system that will be used, but thought I would clarify that Fedora 16 is off scope for Amahi.
As of now, we are focusing on Ubuntu. It is getting close to being a stable Beta version. Once it's up and running with apps and Greyhole, we can then look more at Fedora 17. It appears there are some hurdles that Fedora has thrown in for us overcome.
As of now, we are focusing on Ubuntu. It is getting close to being a stable Beta version. Once it's up and running with apps and Greyhole, we can then look more at Fedora 17. It appears there are some hurdles that Fedora has thrown in for us overcome.
ßîgƒσστ65
Applications Manager
My HDA: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz on MSI board, 16GB RAM, 1TBx1+2TBx2+4TBx2
Applications Manager
My HDA: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz on MSI board, 16GB RAM, 1TBx1+2TBx2+4TBx2
Re: BRTFS
i think the lack of a fsck tool is a kernel issue based on my friend Google's findings....
i suspect they will have it resolved by the time Fedora 17 releases or maybe the next kernel update after....
i just wanted to let peeps know that fsck doesnt happen like with ext4...etc.
i suspect they will have it resolved by the time Fedora 17 releases or maybe the next kernel update after....
i just wanted to let peeps know that fsck doesnt happen like with ext4...etc.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests